Andrew Harrop (December 2017): How can Labour respond to the economic and cultural fears that caused the 2016 vote for Brexit? Labour’s dilemma to reconcile the views of cultural liberals and cultural conservatives is being discussed by Andrew Harrop, General Secretary of the Fabian Society.
Cameron Tait (December 2017): The future of work bears a variety of challenges for governments across the world, to equip workforces for new environments and requirements. This report by Cameron Tait from the Changing Work Centre compares the UK with innovative approaches of lifelong learning in five other countries, such as the white book process "Work 4.0" in Germany.
Keith D. Ewing (December 2017): How will Brexit affect workers’ rights? Can current EU-standards like paid holiday or maternity leave be maintained in future agreements? Opportunities and risks of Brexit for workers are being assessed by Professor Keith D. Ewing, President of the Institute of Employment Rights.
Sunder Katwala (November 2017): What are the aims of the British government during the Brexit negotiations? And what is their perspective on the alleged contradiction between UK market access and control over migration? What the British want and what they possibly could get shows Sunder Katwala, Director of British Future.
Silke Breimaier, Megan Corton Scott and Andrew Robertson (Edt., July 2017): Following our joint “Reimagining the Existing Economic Model” conference in April 2017, Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung London and the Fabian Women’s Network launched a pamphlet on new economic thinking with contributions from experts across a variety of sectors. In the pamphlet, leading female thinkers discuss their ideas for a renewal of our economies and the arising challenges for the modern Left.
Carys Roberts (May 2017): Politics in most countries are still very much dominated by men, which leads to a democratic deficit, as half of the population is not properly represented in local, regional or federal governments. The Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung London and the Institute for Policy Research (IPPR) published a report that compares the representation of women in the various governments in the UK and Germany. It does not only compare figures but highlights helpful examples from which countries could learn from each other. The research shows that political parties have a crucial gate keeper role in ensuring gender equality in the political arena.
In November 2016 FES London and the New Economics Foundation (NEF) jointly hosted a workshop in London to discuss and debate new technological trends and how they impact inequality on society. The workshop was attended by representatives from industry, civil society and government, and discussion was stimulated by contributions from Professor Daniel Buhr from the Universität Tübingen, based on research conducted by himself and colleagues, and Annie Quick and Stephen Devlin from NEF. This paper summarises the key points that emerged from the workshop and serves as a basis for further discussion.
Brendan Donelly (December 2016): For many, the momentum behind Brexit has seemed unstoppable since the referendum. A re-united conservative Party will support May's desire to trigger Article 50 of the Lisbon Treaty by the end of March. However, it would be premature to argue that British withdrawal is a foregone conclusion. May and her colleagues would do well to remember that "normality" has been a poor guide to the course of British politics over the past 12 months. In this paper Brendan Donelly explores the potential stumbling blocks on the way towards Brexit. Cumulatively, they illuminate the political and practical contradictions within the entire project and point towards a potential combination of circumstances in which the proclaimed divorce between the UK and the EU may not take place after all.
Wolfgang Schroeder (November 2016): The debate about the digitalisation of production has been given fresh stimulus around the world. No other growth discourse has been so strongly pushed by state technology and research policies and at the same time so closely linked to the entrepreneurial and union players in Germany in recent years as the Industry 4.0 discourse. This paper discusses the conditions, potentials, players and prospects associated with the Industry 4.0 strategies. The aim is not merely to generate and use new technical options, but also to examine whether and how the German production model, which, contrary to the disruptive US model for instance, relies on incrementally evolutionary changes, can compete in light of the new challenges.
Hartmut Hirsch-Kreinsen (2016): In 2013 the low-skilled accounted for 23 percent of the German workforce. Low-skilled work, generally done by workers with few qualifications, is thus clearly an integral component of modern industrial production. In the current “Industry 4.0” discussions about mechanising, automating and digitalising the entire world of work, low-skilled work and repetitive tasks are treated as increasingly anachronistic relics from the early industrial era. It is suggested that within just a few years there will be no industrial jobs left for the unskilled and semi-skilled, leaving many workers facing social exclusion and loss of status. In fact, talk of a general erosion of low-skilled work is premature. Over the past fifteen years this type of work has actually stabilised, after industrial rationalisation processes…
Page 7 of 3
23 Devereux Court WC2R 3JJ London
info.london(at)fes.de
31/32 Parnell Square W D01 X682 Dublin
info.dublin(at)fes.de
You are interested in accessing more digitalized publications from FES London?
more
Voters in the UK and across the EU have repeatedly demanded change. This demand is driven by a widely held belief that politics has not served... More
This paper identifies several security risks that would need to be considered by European policymakers ahead of the election on 5th November 2024,... More
On Monday 30th September, the Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung and Another Europe is Possible (AEiP) co-hosted a full-day conference on Confronting... More
This site uses third-party website tracking technologies to provide and continually improve our services, and to display advertisements according to users' interests. I agree and may revoke or change my consent at any time with effect for the future.
These technologies are required to activate the core functionality of the website.
This is an self hosted web analytics platform.
Data Purposes
This list represents the purposes of the data collection and processing.
Technologies Used
Data Collected
This list represents all (personal) data that is collected by or through the use of this service.
Legal Basis
In the following the required legal basis for the processing of data is listed.
Retention Period
The retention period is the time span the collected data is saved for the processing purposes. The data needs to be deleted as soon as it is no longer needed for the stated processing purposes.
The data will be deleted as soon as they are no longer needed for the processing purposes.
These technologies enable us to analyse the use of the website in order to measure and improve performance.
This is a video player service.
Processing Company
Google Ireland Limited
Google Building Gordon House, 4 Barrow St, Dublin, D04 E5W5, Ireland
Location of Processing
European Union
Data Recipients
Data Protection Officer of Processing Company
Below you can find the email address of the data protection officer of the processing company.
https://support.google.com/policies/contact/general_privacy_form
Transfer to Third Countries
This service may forward the collected data to a different country. Please note that this service might transfer the data to a country without the required data protection standards. If the data is transferred to the USA, there is a risk that your data can be processed by US authorities, for control and surveillance measures, possibly without legal remedies. Below you can find a list of countries to which the data is being transferred. For more information regarding safeguards please refer to the website provider’s privacy policy or contact the website provider directly.
Worldwide
Click here to read the privacy policy of the data processor
https://policies.google.com/privacy?hl=en
Click here to opt out from this processor across all domains
https://safety.google/privacy/privacy-controls/
Click here to read the cookie policy of the data processor
https://policies.google.com/technologies/cookies?hl=en
Storage Information
Below you can see the longest potential duration for storage on a device, as set when using the cookie method of storage and if there are any other methods used.
This service uses different means of storing information on a user’s device as listed below.
This cookie stores your preferences and other information, in particular preferred language, how many search results you wish to be shown on your page, and whether or not you wish to have Google’s SafeSearch filter turned on.
This cookie measures your bandwidth to determine whether you get the new player interface or the old.
This cookie increments the views counter on the YouTube video.
This is set on pages with embedded YouTube video.
This is a service for displaying video content.
Vimeo LLC
555 West 18th Street, New York, New York 10011, United States of America
United States of America
Privacy(at)vimeo.com
https://vimeo.com/privacy
https://vimeo.com/cookie_policy
This cookie is used in conjunction with a video player. If the visitor is interrupted while viewing video content, the cookie remembers where to start the video when the visitor reloads the video.
An indicator of if the visitor has ever logged in.
Registers a unique ID that is used by Vimeo.
Saves the user's preferences when playing embedded videos from Vimeo.
Set after a user's first upload.
This is an integrated map service.
Gordon House, 4 Barrow St, Dublin 4, Ireland
https://support.google.com/policies/troubleshooter/7575787?hl=en
United States of America,Singapore,Taiwan,Chile
http://www.google.com/intl/de/policies/privacy/